Targ and Puthoff published sensory-shielded information-transfer experiments in Nature in 1974. PSIGames treats that work as a historical protocol reference, not as settled proof.
Read sourceResearch brief
A global experiment needs curiosity and restraint.
PSIGames is inspired by peer-reviewed psi, remote-viewing, telepathy, and precognition research. The app is designed around blind targets, delayed reveal, chance baselines, and visible caveats because the field is controversial and replication is the point.
Free-response and Ganzfeld studies shaped modern sender-receiver protocols. Meta-analyses report positive effects, while critics emphasize file-drawer, methodology, and replication concerns.
Read sourceBem reported anomalous retroactive effects in 2011. Subsequent failures to replicate and Bayesian critiques are part of the reason PSIGames keeps claims narrow and logs protocol details.
Read sourceMossbridge, Tressoldi, and Utts reviewed predictive physiological anticipation studies. The topic is controversial, so the app reports hit rates, confidence, and chance baselines rather than certainty.
Read sourceThe strongest skeptical critiques of remote-viewing work focus on cues, leakage, judging bias, and flexible analysis. PSIGames starts every trial with a blind code and delayed target reveal.
Read source